About Me

My photo
Singapore, Singapore
Dr John Yam Poh Nam, Ph.D. (University of South Australia), MBA (University of Strathclyde), B. Eng, Electrical (National University of Singapore) 任保南博士 南澳大利亚大学, 斯特拉思克莱德大学, 新加坡国立大学 Council Member of The Workers' Party, Served as Inspector of Police - Singapore Police Force (1981-83)

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Suicides Rise in Singapore

Another student suicide reported last week (17th July 2010) 22yo undergrad jumped from Whampoa HDB. This is the 8th case since 2010 started, 3 NTU, 2 NUS, 1 Temasek Poly, 1 Republic Poly! It's highly sceptical that these suicides have anything to do with the economic downturn as reported in The Straits Times 26th July 2010.

The Straits Times 26th July: SUICIDES rose in Singapore last year (2009) as the economy went into a recession. A total of 401 people took their own lives, up from 364 in 2008.In the latest statistics released on Monday by the Samaritans of Singapore (SOS), a helpline dedicated to suicide prevention, the rate of suicide went up from 8.76 per 100,000 residents in 2008 to 9.35 last year as Singapore battled its worst recession. While suicide rates have been known to rise during bad times, the SOS statistics are showing more worryingly, that suicide rates among youths are on the rise as well.The total number of suicides among those aged 10 to 19 years reached a six-year high in 2009, with 19 youths taking their own lives. This is a stark 58 per cent jump from a year earlier when 12 suicide cases among youths were reported.Based on statistics from 1991 to now, there has been three clear peaks in suicide rates among youths in Singapore, occuring in 1998, 2001 and 2009, all of which coincided with the economic instability.During the Asian financial crisis in 1998, youth suicides jumped from 22 deaths from 14 the year before. Similarly, youth suicides hit a record 27 deaths in 2001 during the economic downturn.

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Fare Hike - Transplanting of ERP Approach !

Recent transport fare changes add to another anger and frustration to the already much burdened Singaporeans, amidst the rising cost of housing, overcrowding of public transport, increased jobs competition from foreigners and the long hours of work and stress.Public tranport operators are transplanting ERP approach to force diversion of commuters to change lines due to overcrowding of trains. If not, they will be penalized by fare hike, everyone, young and old. This really hurts.
Car owners get penalized for driving, so either pay or use public
transport. Now to bus/train users, you caused overcrowding by using
public transport, so either pay more or walk to work. Never mind if
you are students or retired with no income. Something is seriously wrong here!
刘氏佣民, 汉世春秋
李后酒诗, 国殇绝唐
强曹霸羽, 未能尊胜
立备后邦, 汉室盛世
- 任保南博士

Do away with Primary School Exams Entirely

Scandinavian education systems do not have examinations until students are in secondary school. And yet, there is no evidence of a lack in prowess or economic performance.

Furthermore, Scandinavians are among the most socially responsible people in the world. They are world-class citizens in all the fundamental aspects - some of which we still lack, for example, road manners.

While I applaud the Education Ministry's decision, it should adopt a bolder and more effective decision to do away with primary school examinations entirely.

This radical change will harvest us a reward of First World innovation and creativity.

- Samuel Ng

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Singapore Spending More Money on Tuition than any other Country

AMID shops selling things like designer bread and wrist-watches is a little stall that hawks an unlikely item in most countries except Singapore – school test papers.

These bound documents, covering English, Maths, Science and Chinese in the 2009 exam, are sold at between S$30 and $40 per set. There are scores of such vendors all over the city.

In two nearby blocks of three-storey buildings in a suburban town centre, I counted no less than 15 tuition centres that offer almost every subject a child faces in the city’s stressful exams.

Others teach Life Sciences, Creative Writing or “Preparation for Primary 1”. Two are music centres, one teaches art and another provides Japanese lessons – mostly supplementary subjects.

At another suburb a kilometre away, 12 or more tuition centres are flourishing.

Private tuition – together with the trade in test papers – has become a booming industry, probably raking in hundreds of millions of dollars and providing jobs for thousands of people.

These figures may be too conservative, if one takes into account what Singaporean parents spend on tuition to give their kids a head start.

A reporter who did a random interview with 12 students found that their parents spent an average S$500 a month on their tuition fees.

In another case, a Chinese-language newspaper reported a father spent almost half his monthly salary, or S$960, to pay for his son’s English lessons.

In other countries, old test papers are generally used to wrap fish, but here it provides a living. Why are they so marketable?

Just as in societies like China, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea, Singaporeans worship academic achievement, maybe a little too excessively, some believe.

They have seen success often going to graduates with distinctions. They are picked for high office. It is exam results that often decide how well people are to live.

This is making test papers of top schools a hot commodity. Designed by individual primary and secondary schools to test their own pupils annually, they have long been packaged and sold.

The higher ranked the school, the greater the demand.

In this small city of 700sq km, there are at least 500 tuition centres, each with a database of home tutors for parents to select from.

The teachers charge hourly rates: S$15-S$20 for Primary 1-6, and S$20-S$28 for secondary 1-4.

Some tuition even takes place online, where test papers can be downloaded more cheaply. Some top junior college graduates have taken it further by selling their study notes on the web.

The exact size of the trade is not officially known because the thousands of people involved – especially freelance tutors or test paper vendors – work outside the tax system.

With the weak employment market for graduates, this is useful. It has allowed many retrenched professionals and executives to survive the crisis of unemployment.

More importantly, the role of the home tutor appears greater than the government is ready to admit. It touches the life of almost every Singaporean.

The Sunday Times conducted a poll in 2008 of 100 primary, secondary and junior college students and found that only three students did not have any tuition at all.

Even some university students have sought special tuition, but the starting age is getting lower. Two in every 10 involve kindergarten kids.

Contrary to belief, not all who seek help are students of average or poorer grades. They include straight-A students, too.

Predictably, the world crisis has pushed up the number of private tutors, many settling into it because it is recession-proof. This has allowed some jobless to survive.

A few with flair have actually done well enough to make it a career.

For example, a physics tutor to 80 students reportedly earns about S$20,000 a month. Even students – undergraduates and Junior College students – are earning good pocket money this way.

The term “private tuition” is generally disliked by fun-loving teens and, one suspects, by the government, too, for two reasons.

First, the vast number of Singaporeans who rely on outside tuition is interpreted by critics as indicating that the school system is far from adequate.

Second, a lot of this thriving revenue is going to individuals, rather than the Treasury – unreported and untaxed. It is part of the underground economy that no finance minister wants to have.

Singapore could well be spending more money per person on special tuition for their children than any other country.

Does tuition help to improve grades? The answer cannot be “no” when 97% of students have done it.

It provides a crucial help to children who are weak in certain subjects, be it English, Maths or Chinese. Singapore schools supply a general education that is quite modern and diverse.

It is winning accolades from some countries which have adopted its methods of teaching. However, it also faces criticisms for not producing creative workers good at solving problems.

A retired school principal commented: “Our children are very good at Science and Maths, but they are not groomed to be independent thinkers.”

- Seah Chiang Nee.

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Is MOE on the Right Track?

MOE policy makers including the minister, failed to differentiate
and communicate long term cornerstone policies that should not and
will not easily and readily change in short terms, from short term
programs and practices that must promply adapt to rapid changing socio-
economic environments, both local and global. Bilingual and moral
education are example of the first. Use of evolving educational,
instructional and learning technologies and pedagogies, say, applied
to mother tongue for adaptation, is the second.

School principals who are under constant pressure to perform
according to moe KPIs by toeing the line of their bosses at HQ, rather
than professionally, selflessly and courageously acting by convictions
to do what is right and good for students in the long run but may not
be within moe's immedate interests or priorities. The constant
conflict here is what is for students' long term good, may not be good
for the school (in terms of ranking performance, publicity and
popularity) and the principal's personal performance and career
advancement. So, practically all schools degenerate into MOE's
nationwide distributed network of education factories producing 'on-specs' school
graduates with good grades, not necessarily competent, lifelong
learners and good citizens of society. In short, very, very few
principals are running schools according to their conviction and
professional ethics as educators - not independent and autonomous.
Even though they may know what is good and right, they won't do it. In
practice, they are very much civil servants of the ministry and the
ministers, much more than of their students! Sad but true, this is the
pathetic state and harsh reality of the school systems in this nation.
distributed network of education factories producing 'on-specs' school
graduates with good grades, not necessarily competent, lifelong
learners and good citizens of society. In short, very, very few
principals are running schools according to their econviction and
professional ethics as educators - not independent and autonomous.
Even though they may know what is good and right, they won't do it. In
practice, they are very much civil servants of the ministry and the
ministers, much more than of their students! Sad but true, this is the
pathetic state and harsh reality of the school systems in this nation.

Monday, July 12, 2010

The Straits Times Interview, Sue-Ann Chia - Senior Political Correspondent : Ready to Take on a Bigger Role

Friday, 9 July 2010 — WPSN
THE WP QUARTET OF NEW LEADERS
Insight

Four fresh faces joined the Workers’ Party’s new line-up of 15 leaders at a party conference on Sunday. Insight speaks to the quartet to find out what propelled them to take up the opposition cause

BY SUE-ANN CHIA
SENIOR POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT

JOHN YAM

Age: 48

Job: Technology consultant

Education: PhD, University of South Australia; Masters in Business Administration, University of Strathclyde, Scotland; Bachelor of Eng (Electrical Engineering), National University of Singapore

Status: Married with two children: a son, 17, and a daughter, 12

Pet peeve: The stressful education system in Singapore

Passionate about: Changing the education system

DR JOHN Yam says it is no secret that he was a member of the ruling People’s Action Party’s (PAP) youth wing in the mid-1990s.

He was helping out in then Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s Teck Ghee ward in Ang Mo Kio, as his friend’s father was a grassroots leader there.

But he stopped his PAP activities after two years and let his membership lapse.

He did not feel very engaged, he says, and decided to focus his energy on pursuing his PhD.

Yet, his heart was never very far from politics. Before the 2006 general election, he began to consider being a political activist again. This time, in the opposition.

Why not the PAP?

“I want to play a constructive role. I don’t think I’ll be effective in the PAP as I won’t have the same freedom to talk about issues I feel strongly about,” he says.

He also thinks the current batches of leaders are not as inspiring or as grounded as those of earlier days.

The Workers’ Party (WP) caught his attention and he attended all its election rallies.

“I found them to be very responsible. They don’t want to rock the boat just for the sake of it,” he says.

“They want to provide competition, and were gentlemanly in their ways.”

But it took him almost three years before he joined the party, answering a calling he could no longer deny, says Dr Yam, who is a Christian.

He became a member in the middle of last year, with an aim to speak up for those who cannot do it themselves.

What issue does he want to raise?

The answer rolls readily off his tongue: Change the education system.

What gets his goat is the elitism, undue stress and what he describes as “aggressive streaming” in schools.

He writes regularly about these issues on his blog, criticising the system which he says penalises late bloomers.

“Education is not about competition but learning,” he says, sharing his personal experiences.

The former Beatty Secondary School student says he started concentrating on his studies only in Secondary 3, and did well enough in his O levels to get into the then Hwa Chong Junior College.

He then went on to get a bachelor’s degree, a master’s and a doctorate.

But he believes if he was in the current system, he would have been “finished” as he did not do well in his Primary School Leaving Examination.

Despite the pressure in schools, his advice to his two children has always been: Don’t worry about exams.

“Daddy will be happy as long as you put in your best effort,” he says, adding that what is more important in life is character building.

He says the flaw in the education system can be seen in our lack of Nobel Prize winners or even innovative companies like Ikea, Nokia or Apple.

He wants to set it right in Singapore.

“It starts with cultivating the right passion,” he says.

Monday, July 5, 2010

An Honour to Serve in The Workers' Party Leadership Team

Workers' Party re-elects stalwarts
05:55 AM Jul 05, 2010

SINGAPORE -The Workers' Party re-elected 11 of its 14 Central Executive Committee members yesterday, with party chairman Sylvia Lim and secretary-general Low Thia Khiang keeping their posts.
Four new members were elected, including those who had joined in the last two years.

Mr Gerald Giam, 33, a senior consultant with a global technology consulting firm joined the party about one-and-a-half years ago.

Another new council member is Dr John Yam, 48, whose blog states that he is in the telecommunications industry and that he holds a doctorate from the University of South Australia.

The other two are members who have been active in the WP Youth Wing.
Ms Frieda Chan, 34, joined the party in October 2006 and was elected as a member of the WPYW Executive Committee in 2008.
She was listed as the co-founding board director and chairperson of Life! Community Development and serving as social work ambassador for The Singapore Association of Social Workers.

The fourth new member is Mr Muhammad Faisal Abdul Manap, who served on the WPYW Executive Committee between 2006 and 2008.

Making way for these new faces were three candidates for the party at the previous General Election: Dr Poh Lee Guan, 48, who had contested in Nee Soon East; Brandon Siow, 34, and Perry Tong, 38, both of whom were part of the team which contested the East Coast Group Representation Constituency (GRC).